REFORMED-INJILI?

Thursday, June 29, 2006

REFORMED CALVINISM FATALISM

R.C. Sproul writes, “God desired man to fall into sin. God created sin.”

This is a false teaching based on forced logic upon Scripture.

Ajaran sesat bahwa Allah menginginkan manusia jatuh dalam dosa dan Allah mencipta dosa adalah penghujatan. Tidak ada ajaran demikian dalam Alkitab. Tetapi itulah yg diajarkan Stephen Tong dan kroniya Daniel Lucas Lukito.

STT Reformed Injili dan Seminari Asia Tenggara mengajarkan fatalisme tersebut.

Ajaran ini berbahaya.

Monday, June 26, 2006

STEPHEN TONG & TULIP SESAT KAN REFORMED INJILI

Tulip adalah man-made doctrine yang gagal dan menyedihkan. Bukan semata menyedihkan tetapi menyesatkan. Ajaran doktrin TULIP adalah karangan yang merusak iman Kristen.


Berikut kutipan buku Frank Page: Trouble With The Tulip



The downside of this resurgence (of Calvinism) is that many people are falling into a trap set long ago. Manmade doctrines always fail. When any person or person begins to adhere to the teachings of one person, they join the company of many others who have made this serious mistake. It is most grievous to see a large number of individuals accept without question the doctrine of John Calvin in regards to salvation. (P. 73-74)

If one does follow the logic of Calvinism, then a missionary or evangelistic spirit is unnecessary. If irresistible grace is the truth, then there is no need to share Christ with anyone, since those persons whom God has elected are irresistibly going to be drawn into His kingdom anyway. If one studies the pages of history, one will see that Calvinistic theology (Five Point) has encouraged a slackening of the aggressive evangelistic and missionary heartbeat of the church. All too often, this precious spirit of concern and urgency is replaced by a cold, logical, haughty spirit. (P. 74-75)

Herschel Hobbs said it well when he described John 3:16 “For God so loved the world (not certain ones in it), that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever (anyone, anywhere, anytime) believeth (an act of man’s free will) in Him should not perish (be lost, destroyed, or go to hell), but have everlasting life.” God’s Word is clear. Let it speak for itself. (P. 76)

I want to very clearly state that my intention in this book is not simply to disprove the philosophical system of Calvinism, though I believe that will occur. Instead of adhering to a system of logic, which many seek to do or adhering in blind devotion to the teachings of any one scholar, as some are prone to do, I propose that we look to God’s Word for His clear teaching. (P. 7)

There are many persons belonging to churches that officially believe “five point” Calvinism. Many of them express surprise when they are told what their church truly believes. I would like to challenge all who truly believe in five point Calvinism to stop being closet Calvinists! If you truly believe these doctrines, then let others know about it. They need to know what you believe. (P. 42)

Sunday, June 25, 2006

REFORMED CALVINISM INJILI STEPHEN TONG AJARAN SESAT

TONG HIS CRONY LUKITO TEACH REGENERATION BEFORE HEARING THE GOSPEL.

IT IS SIMILAR TO GRUDEM IN HIS CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY P. 500

He writes on page 500,
Yet it certainly is possible for God to bring regeneration (that is, new spiritual life) to an infant even before he or she is born. This was true of John the Baptist, for the angel Gabriel, before John was born said, "He will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb" (Luke 1:15). We might say that John the Baptist was "born again" before he was born!
THIS IS A HERESY CREATED BY CALVIN

REFORMED CALVINISM REFORMED INJILI HERESY DANGEROUS

"Poets do not go mad;

but chess players do...

Only one great English poet went mad, Cowper.

And he was definitely driven mad by logic,

by the ugly and alien logic of predestination.

Poetry was not the disease, but the medicine...

He was damned by John Calvin."

--G K Chesterton

Monday, June 12, 2006

REFORMED INJILI STEPHEN TONG DKK DIEXPOSE KESESATANNYA OLEH ERGUN CANER TEOLOG TERKEMUKA DI USA

1. Double Predestination. Simply put, they believe that a small group of people are predestined, even before the Creation, for heaven, and that the vast majority of the world is predestined, even created for, hell.

2. Not all babies who die go to heaven. They do not say outright that "non-elect babies who die go to hell." They simply say that they leave such issues to the sovereignty of God. This raises the issue of the very nature of God, doesn’t it? Thankfully, most theologians through the centuries have denied this teaching.

3. God’s "love for mankind" must be redefined. Yes, they will say, God does love the world, but His love is a matter of degrees. He can love a person and still predestine them for hell. Citations such as John 3:16, II Peter 3:9, and others, are redefined or reassigned to some other topic, such as eschatology. They do not believe that God wants a relationship with everyone. That would go against their system and theology.

4. Invitations are an insult to the sovereignty of God. Disturbing as this may sound, some ministers of this stripe have stopped giving invitations in their services.

5. Calvinism is the only Gospel. Simply put, when a person holds this narrow view, they become exclusivists. They believe that Calvinism, and only Calvinism, is the preaching of the Gospel. One historian wrote, "Calvinism is just another name for Christianity."1 If that is true, what does that say about the myriad of preachers throughout Church history who were not Calvinists? Were they even saved?

We have all encountered that person in our church, or in a seminary class, who greets us with the question: "Do you believe in the ‘Doctrines of Grace’?" I often remind them that the name they have chosen for their position is only half-right. They may believe in the "Doctrines of Grace" for themselves, but they hold to the "Doctrines of Damnation" for most people, unless they view the damnation of souls to hell as a work of grace.

Neither Calvinist nor Arminian, but Baptist

Since my salvation, I have been a Baptist. Since coming to Liberty University, my wife and I have been members of Thomas Road Baptist Church, which has an amazing history and a 50-year trail of miracles. Yet, being a Baptist goes back even further than a building. In the 16th century, our Anabaptist forefathers were not so mingled with the Reformed movement in Geneva. In fact, they were hunted in virtually every country in continental Europe. Men such as Michael Sattler and Balthasar Hubmaier suffered at the hands of all of the Magisterial Reform movements, including the Calvinists.

That is the core historical issue. In our history, Free Church believers have never been adherents to one particular system or philosophy. We certainly have not been locked to a scholastic movement that was formed by men. We are Biblicists. We believe the Bible is inerrant, not because a particular creed forces us to do so, but because we see Scripture as plain on that issue. We are adamant that Jesus Christ — virgin-born, living a sinless life, crucified, buried, physically resurrected and soon returning — is the only Savior because the Bible states it, regardless of the whims and wishes of men.

Assumptions of the New Breed

So then, why should I address this issue now? Do I not have more important issues at hand, as the president of the seminary? In the last month, Liberty Seminary has announced the advent of ten new Master’s degrees (see sidebar). In the last year, we have grown almost 50 percent in resident students. Truly, my hands are full.

However, the implications of this struggle are vast. As churches and seminaries become more enamored with these teachings, many leaders have stood by silently, or simply grumbled under their breath. Following the lead of Chancellor Falwell, I felt someone needed to challenge the assumptions of this new breed. So, let it be known: I believe Jesus Christ died to save mankind and offers salvation to every living soul. I believe in the "whosoever will." I believe that His love and salvation are extended to every person who will repent of sin and trust in Him.

Consider me predestined not to be a Hyper Calvinist.

REFORMED INJILI STEPHEN TONG PERKOSA FIRMAN UTK SETUJUI CALVIN

ALKITAB PERINTAH ORANG BERDOSA UNTUK BERTOBAT & PERCAYA INJIL.


CALVIN BERKATA ORANG BERDOSA TIDAK BISA BERTOBAT & TIDAK BISA PERCAYA INJIL.


ALKITAB AJARKAN ORANG BISA BERTOBAT DAN BISA PERCAYA INJIL. STEPHEN TONG, REFORMED INJILI DAN MURIDNYA DANIEL LUCAS LUKITO MEMPERKOSA FIRMAN UNTUK SETUJUI CALVIN BAHWA ORANG TIDAK BISA PECAYA INJIL.


In Mark 1:15, Jesus said:

“You repent and you believe in the gospel…metanoeite kai pisteuete en tō euaggeliō.

Note that both repent and believe are in the imperative mood of command. Implicit to this inescapable imperative laid upon human kind by Jesus is His understanding of the following:

That man has a will, and if he has a will, it is necessarily free

That man is not passive in terms of the necessity to act

That man is active in his salvation

That man is not brought to salvation by irresistible grace–so called–in a state of total inability

STEPHEN TONG DAN REFORMED INJILI MEMPERKOSA FIRMAN UNTUK MENYETUJUI CALVIN

Sunday, June 11, 2006

REFORMED INJILI STEPHEN TONG TRUS NYURI DOMBA

GRII GEREJA REFORMED INJILI STEPHEN TONG TERUS 'MENGINJILI' ANGGOTA GEREJA LAIN; KHUSUS GKI, GPIB, HKBP, GMIM DLL. ITU PROGRAM INTI STEPEHEN TONG.

GRII TONG TIDAK MENGINJILI NON KRISTEN, TETAPI 'MENGINJILI' [MENCURI] YG SUDAH ANGGOTA GEREJA LAIN.

GRII STEPHEN TONG TIDAK ADA PROGRAM PENGINJILAN KE NON KRISTEN. YANG ADA HANYA KKR DAN SPIK YG DITUJUKAN KEPADA ANGGOTA2 GEREJA DENOMINASI LAIN. ITULAH FOKUS GRII REFORMED INJILI.

CARA LICIK CARA MAFIA CINA ITULAH BUDAYA MAFIA BUDAYA UNDERGROUND CINA YANG DIBAPTIS MENJADI REFORMED INJILI. CARA2 LICIK DIBAPTISKAN SECARA LIHAI OLEH KELUARGA TONG UNTUK MENCARI KEUNTUNGAN PRIBADI. CARA MAFIA CARA UNDERGROUND CARA BLACK MARKET CINA ITU DIREFORMEDKAN CALEB TONG, STEPHEN TONG, JOSEP TONG DLL UNTUK SECARA GELAP DENGAN POLA DUNIA HITAM MENCURI JEMAAT GEREJA LAIN.

STEPHEN TONG BERSAUDARA TIDAK PERNAH MENGADAKAN KKR DAN SPIK UNTUK GRII TETAPI UNTUK MENCURI JEMAAT GEREJA2 LAIN. CARA2 KRIMINAL INI DIATASNAMAKAN PENGINJILAN TETAPI ITULAH PERAMPASAN JEMAAT LAIN YANG DIROHANIKAN--ITULAH KELICIKAN CINA DUNIA GELAP CINA DIBAWA MASUK GEREJA OLEH TONG BROTHERS.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

STEPHEN TONG & DANIEL LUCAS LUKITO BERHALAKAN CALVIN

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN APPEAL TO AUTHORITY. OTORITAS CALVIN BUKAN OTORITAS ALLAH DALAM FIRMAN

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT BUAT KESALAHAN CULTURAL FALACY: KECINAAN MEREKA LEBIH UNGGUL DARI KEKRISTENAN MEREKA. SEMUA STAF DAN LAINNYA ADALAH CINA; FOKUS MINISTRY JUGA CINA; ORIENTASI GEOGRAFIS JUGA CINA.

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN FATAL: APPEAL TO TRADITION. SEPERTI KATOLIK, REFORMED CALVINISM APPEAL PADA TRADISI CALVINIS.

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN ARGUMENTUM AD NAUSEUM--MENCEKIK MAHASISWA MEREKA DENGAN KUTIPAN BERKEPANJANGAN DARI CALVIN, CONFESSIONS, DAN SEDERET CALVINIS LAINNYA. MAXIMUM NON BIBLICAL TRADITION.

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN AD LAPIDEM: SEGALA YANG TIDAK BISA DIJELASKAN DAN BEDA DARI CALVINIS TANPA ALASAN DIVONIS ARMINIAN.

STEPHEN TONG & DANIEL LUCAS LUKITO BERHALAKAN CALVIN

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN APPEAL TO AUTHORITY. OTORITAS CALVIN BUKAN OTORITAS ALLAH DALAM FIRMAN

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT BUAT KESALAHAN CULTURAL FALACY: KECINAAN MEREKA LEBIH UNGGUL DARI KEKRISTENAN MEREKA. SEMUA STAF DAN LAINNYA ADALAH CINA; FOKUS MINISTRY JUGA CINA; ORIENTASI GEOGRAFIS JUGA CINA.

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN FATAL: APPEAL TO TRADITION. SEPERTI KATOLIK, REFORMED CALVINISM APPEAL PADA TRADISI CALVINIS.

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN ARGUMENTUM AD NAUSEUM--MENCEKIK MAHASISWA MEREKA DENGAN KUTIPAN BERKEPANJANGAN DARI CALVIN, CONFESSIONS, DAN SEDERET CALVINIS LAINNYA. MAXIMUM NON BIBLICAL TRADITION.

TONG DAN LUKITO BUAT KESALAHAN AD LAPIDEM: SEGALA YANG TIDAK BISA DIJELASKAN DAN BEDA DARI CALVINIS TANPA ALASAN DIVONIS ARMINIAN.

STEPHEN TONG & REFORMED INJILI: CONFUSIONISME

REFORMED INJILI DENGAN GURUNYA STEPHEN TONG, DANIEL LUCAS LUKITO CS CONFUSED CALVINIS DENGAN WAHYU. SERINGKALI WAHYU ALKITAB HANYA DIJADIKAN ALAT PEMBUKTIAN CALVINIS YANG DIANGGAP SEBAGAI 'WAHYU' DALAM WAHYU.

KETERGANTUNGAN REFORMED INJILI STEPHEN TONG, DANIEL LUCAS LUKITO DLL BUKAN PADA WAHYU FIRMAN TETAPI PADA 'FIRMAN' JOHN CALVIN.

CONFUSIONISME DANIEL LUCAS LUKITO DAN STEPHEN TONG SEMATA MEREPETISI JOHN CALVIN BUKAN MEMPELAJARI ALKITAB. STT REFORMED INJILI DAN STT SAAT MALANG HANYA MEREPETISI JOHN CALVIN. INI ADALAH CUNFUSIONISME.